BioEdit: user reviews - Software Informer (page 2)

#

孙佳聪

Very useful.

0

| Reply

K

K Nick

Very useful for most common sequence-related tasks, pity it is no longer developed...

2

0

| Reply

C

Christiane Weissenbacher-Lang

Very nice software! Sometimes there are bugs, but they are fixed.

0

| Reply

A

AHiller

Great software but now something in Windows 10 makes it incompatible and now the scroll bar (vertical and horizontal) is not working. Makes looking at alignments very hard.

15

0

| Reply

J

jfbai

I have the same problem, the scroll bars are not working with the new Windows 10 updates. Hope it can be fixed soon. Thanks!

7

0

| Reply

I

IRMA MONROY

I have used BioEdit for the past 10 years, it is a great program

1

0

| Reply

S

sijun liu

I have used it for more than 15 YEARS, a GREAT tool!

1

0

| Reply

A

az posht mikonam

I have used Bioedit for many years. It is easy to use, flexible, with some good features. I prefer using it than many expensive programs

2

15

| Reply

T

TAUQEER HUSSAIN

I have used Bioedit for many years. It is easy to use, flexible, with some good features. I prefer using it than many expensive programs.

1

14

| Reply

G

Gidi

I have used Bioedit for many years. It is easy to use, flexible, with some good features. I prefer using it than many expensive programs.

2

15

| Reply

S

Sven Reischauer

Have tried many others, always coming back. But an integration of Clustal Omega instead of Clustal W would be amazing!

0

| Reply

O

Omar Rota-Stabelli

Best bio-editor around after more than 20 years...thanks to the amazing developer!

2

| Reply

W

Wessel van der Loo

Still the best after 50 years research experience. Just don´t forget to save your files step wise when running a large job. Risking out-of-memory > restart PC!
PC

2

| Reply

F

Frank Schubert

Still after all those years by far the best freeware multiple alignment editor around.

0

| Reply

T

Talent

It's a useful program for molecular work

0

3